Government’s social engineering policy to be challenged in the Supreme Court. (#bedroomtax #welfare #ids)

We have reported many times that ‘welfare reforms’ and ‘austerity measures’ are nothing more than a tool to look after the interests of the well-off in our society.

Government policies are to be challenged in the Supreme Court by a family who Westminster Council tried to relocate 50 miles away from their family and social networks.

From The Independent:

A single mother-of-five who was made homeless after resisting Westminster Council’s attempt to move the family 50 miles from the capital is applying to the Supreme Court to review her case.

Titina Nzolameso is a British citizen who has lived in London for 16 years and her children have been settled in schools in Westminster for the past five years. They were forced to leave their four-bedroom flat in Westminster after the introduction of the benefit cap meant housing benefit no longer covered the rent.

The benefit cap ensures that no family can receive more than £500 from the state in a week, including all housing costs. For families in London and other high-rent areas, this puts even social housing beyond the means of many, and experts say the policy is “cleansing” the capital of its poorest residents.

In November 2012 Ms Nzolameso applied for cheaper housing in Westminster, but instead the council offered her accommodation near Milton Keynes, 50 miles away. When she turned that down, the council said it no longer had a duty to find her a home.

Her children Tasnim, 14, Hussain, 13, twins Jamilah and Amirah, 10, and Daliya, 9, have all been placed into foster care until the family has a permanent home. The situation means Ms Nzolameso is sleeping on friends’ sofas and is able to visit her children only at set times three days a week.

“It’s wrong what they’re doing,” Ms Nzolameso said. “London is our home and my children don’t want to move to Milton Keynes. It would disrupt their education.”

“It would either mean a two-hour commute to get my children to school in Westminster, or they would need to be uprooted to new schools in Milton Keynes, an area I have no local connection to whatsoever. There was no evidence to suggest that Westminster had even looked to find me accommodation nearby.”

If she were to leave the capital, Ms Nzolameso is also concerned about losing the network of friends that support her and help out when she is unwell. She suffers from depression, diabetes and high blood pressure.

The family came to Britain from the Democratic Republic of Congo in 1998 and claimed asylum. Ms Nzolameso now has British citizenship. She separated from her children’s father in 2007 but they still have contact with him, although this too would be harder if they moved to Milton Keynes

Ms Nzolameso’s case was turned down by the Court of Appeal last week and her lawyers told The Independent that they now plan to take it to the Supreme Court.

Her solicitor, Jayesh Kunwardia, said: “This judgment could have dire consequences for vulnerable families across the country. It gives the green light for councils to engage in social cleansing of the poor on a mass scale. Council tenants are being threatened with homelessness unless they agree to uproot themselves from communities they’ve lived in for years”.

Rejecting the case last Wednesday, Justice Moore-Bick said: “I accept that the court should be astute to ensure that local housing authorities…do not merely apply policies which lead to accommodation being provided outside their own districts in a routine and unthinking manner. On the other hand, many authorities, of which Westminster is one, are under great pressure to discharge their statutory obligations and should not be prevented from making sensible use in an orderly way of the housing stock available to them, whether within or outside their own districts.”

Of all the families affected by the benefit cap, 49 per cent are in London because of the high housing costs.

Daniel Douglas, a homelessness specialist at the magazine Inside Housing, said: “Out of area homeless placements create havoc for tens of thousands of families and children. They also set off a domino effect, where councils with bigger budgets place families in comparatively cheaper areas, meaning that the councils in these areas themselves can’t find housing for homeless people, and have to place their families in another area. At the end of this line of dominoes, the most deprived areas of the country are overwhelmed with the influx of vulnerable homeless families. A side effect of this policy is social cleansing on a shocking scale.”

Cllr Daniel Astaire, Westminster City Council cabinet member for housing, said: “Councils have a raft of considerations to take into account when finding accommodation, not least their duty towards other people who are already waiting for a home. Had this ruling gone the other way, it would have forced local authorities to disregard the needs of those who had a more pressing need to stay in their area. It would also have required councils to scour every neighbouring borough until they found an available property – without regard for the needs of those already waiting for accommodation – imposing an unreasonable burden on local authority resources.”


Follow @martynjsymons

Feel free to leave your comments below. Comments have to be approved – but we don’t censor alternative opinions and information – we just don’t like spam.

Don’t forget to visit our NEW site too:

The Revelations of Dr Richard Day

Information he revealed in 1969 has come true, and so will his revelations of plans for the future of the world, society – AND YOU!

If you would like to donate to us to help with the annual cost of operating Order Of Truth, please use the Paypal button below. Every donation is appreciated. Thank you.

Donate Button


6 thoughts on “Government’s social engineering policy to be challenged in the Supreme Court. (#bedroomtax #welfare #ids)

  1. i wonder when will that 99percent wake up to the fact they been lied to its has if they are all sleep walking through this bad dream but i wonder will they fall has like us all we been culled hearded and now they want to move some so far away that it upsets all hum im waiting to be woke up is it all a dream jeff3

  2. Sometimes I get this frightening feeling that LABTOR is not going to allow UKIP to take its 100 or 120 seats in May next year. I suspect they might assassinate people they fear could take their lies based power, or arrest them and lock them up indefinitely under the terror laws. Paranoid? Maybe. Maybe not. David Filth, the Downing Street Toilet Scraping voted into the front benches by the witless British Ninny voter, is certainly capable of such terrible acts. The creature has repeatedly lied and broken its promises and it continues to lie about ‘renegotiation’ of rules of UK membership to the EU. It lies about the economy, it lies about the banks, it lies about everything. It is unscrupulous, pitiless, and relentlessly self serving. The majority of witless Ninnies who make up the UK public suck it all down greedily. “Such a nice man”, their nan says toothlessly. Witlessly, their stupid heads bursting with TV soap and advertising jingles, they masturbate their way to the polling station and voter the shit back into power for another 5 years. And that could easily happen next May as well. Don’t overestimate the intelligence of the British. They are truly STUPID. Toilet Scraping knows this, is counting on it and I can’t fault his reasoning. I’m truly sorry to hear that poor people are being cleansed from London, but please, who did Ms Nzolameso vote for in 2010? Ah, thought so. Well Ms Ms Nzolameso, you voted for it, so just take it like a man can’t you, instead of all this whining. You might be the victim of your own stupidity, but so are we all, who had to endure another 5 years of self serving Toilet Scrapings in our Parley House because of thicko Ninnies like you.What really gets me is the suffering of your children. Still, you helped it happen. Now’s your big chance to wake yourself up. Make sure you get to the polling station in Milton Keynes and vote for UKIP.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s