Well this gets harder and harder to believe. The excuse given by the UK and the USA to pre-empt military action against Syria is that they have chemical weapons. They have not used them, they have said they will not use them, there is no evidence they are preparing to use them.
Didn’t we have a similar explanation from the UK and USA when they wanted to invade Iraq? The ‘authorities’ said Iraq had nuclear weapons, they invaded Iraq, there were no nuclear weapons.
Iran? Will they be next on the ‘hit list’? The UK and USA say Iran has nuclear ‘capability’. There is no evidence they have an active nuclear weapons programme, there is no threat from Iran (despite provocation by the USA), Iran has stated it will only defend itself (no expression of nuking the world).
Isn’t it just a bit strange that Israel is KNOWN to have UNDECLARED nuclear weapons, yet the UK and USA seem not to be too concerned about a state that has demonstrated their aggression and has publically declared they are intent on ‘wiping out’ another race. Israel is a country that is known for INSANE acts of violence on a whim, yet the UK and USA have no interest in Israel’s nuclear capabilities.
The strange thing is, the UK and USA use the SAME excuse for invading Arab states again and again. Either they just don’t care what anyone thinks and are going to invade them anyway; they are so stupid that they think no one will notice the connections, they have no imagination, or they are keeping to a plan to wipe out or control the Middle East.
Whatever the reason the UK and USA come up with for invading Arab countries in the Middle East, it will be treated by scepticism. Time and time again they have tried to provoke a reaction from Iran, the major (and strongest) country in the region – yet Iran has not demonstrated any aggression to any other nation for over 200 years – more than can be said for the UK and USA!
When will this MADNESS end?